Should high-speed internet be considered an essential utility? And if so, is it better to be a PUBLIC utility (owned by the state, funded with tax dollars and usage fees) or a PRIVATE utility (owned by profit-driven business for private profit)? Should we ensure that people in rural and remote areas have internet service comparable to the quality of that found in urban centres?

Advertisement

This is a new series I’m creating to throw on the pile of series I’ve created, then abandoned. I want you guys to argue topics. And stuff. No name calling, don’t be a dick, etc., just give a reasonable, articulate response illustrating your opinion on the topic above. 

Ти благодарам!